mutual assistence, not the conflict

The training philosophy and science and Qur’anic wisdom give to human social life is this:

Philosophy accepts ‘force’ as its point of support in social life.

It considers its aim to be ‘benefits’.

The principle of its life it recognizes to be ‘conflict’.

It holds the bond between communities to be ‘racialism and negative nationalism’.

And its fruits are ‘gratifying the appetites of the soul and increasing human needs’.

However, the mark of force is ‘aggression’. The mark of benefit – since they are insufficient for every desire – is ‘jostling and tussling’. While the mark of conflict is ‘strife’. And the mark of racialism – since it is to be nourished by devouring others – is ‘aggression’. Thus, it is for these reasons that it has negated the happiness of mankind.

As for the Qur’anic wisdom, its point of support is ‘truth’ instead of force.

It takes ‘virtue and God’s pleasure’ as its aims in place of benefits.

It takes the principle of ‘mutual assistance’ as the principle of life in place of the principle of conflict.

And it takes ‘the ties of religion, class, and country’ to be the ties bonding communities.

Its aim is to form a barrier against the lusts of the soul, urge the spirit to sublime matters, satisfy the high emotions, and urging man to the human perfections, make him a true human being.

And the mark of ‘the truth’ is accord. The mark of virtue is ‘solidarity’. The mark of mutual assistance is ‘hastening to assist one another’. The mark of religion is ‘brotherhood’ and ‘attraction’. And the mark of reining in and tethering the soul and leaving the spirit free and urging it towards perfections is ‘happiness in this world and the next’.

BEDİÜZZAMAN SAİD NURSİ

PS: TO SEE THIS  PARAGRAPHS, IN TABLE WIEW, PLEASE GO TO NEXT PAGE BY CLICKING HERE;

picture by: The knight and his steed, a tropical capture in Costa Rica. (© Nicolas Reusens, 2014 Sony World Photography Awards)

post available also in this language / bu yazı ayrıca şu dilde mevcut;  Turkish